Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04821
Original file (BC 2013 04821.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:
		DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04821
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM).

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Due to administrative errors/delays his application was not 
processed within the required time per AFI 36-2803 - which 
states “decorations must be completely processed within three 
years of the end date of the nomination.”  He provided the 
awards application which shows the submission was held several 
months with some coordination.  It was forwarded to the 
incorrect Group Commander in March 2012 and it was not re-routed 
to the correct Group Commander.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, he provides email 
communique and a copy of his awards and decorations application.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in 
the grade of senior master sergeant.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTS recommends approval.  DPTS states the governing 
guidance for the Air Force Commendation Medal, issuing a 
recommendation is found in AFI 36-2803, paragraph 3.1.  Although 
the applicant’s decoration entered the official channel of 
coordination, it was not awarded prior to the required three 
year period.  The decoration nomination entered initial 
coordination on 4 July 2011.  The decoration needed to be 
submitted to Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center by 14 
February 2012; however, it was not submitted to Headquarters Air 
Reserve Personnel Center until 5 April 2013.  Therefore, the 
nomination did not meet the requirement of being awarded within 
the three-year time frame.

The applicant submitted documentation (e-mail traffic) with his 
request showing that unit administrative errors led to his 
nomination not being processed in a timely manner.

The DPTS complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 5 May 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit 
C).  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office. 

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  After 
reviewing the evidence provided in support of this appeal, i.e., 
email communique showing that unit administrative errors led to 
his nomination not being processed in a timely manner and the 
favorable recommendation of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility, we find the applicant’s record should be 
corrected to reflect award of the AFCM.  Therefore, we recommend 
his records be corrected as indicated below.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 14 
February 2012, he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal 
(AFCM) for meritorious service during the period from 16 January 
2004 to 14 February 2009.

________________________________________________________________
_



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-04821 in Executive Session on 3 July 2014, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


All members voted to correct the record, as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 October 2013, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 11 December 2013.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 May 2014.





2


3





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02605

    Original file (BC 2014 02605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02605 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) based on his deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Service members must have been assigned, attached, or mobilized to units operating in the area of eligibility for 30 consecutive days or for 60 non-consecutive days or meet one of the following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-03390 Disapproval

    The AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He did not realize this application was being submitted as a request for reconsideration of his MSM. Evidence has been presented that his decoration package was never forwarded through, or endorsed by, the deployed wing commander. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02893

    Original file (BC 2013 02893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior to submitting his request to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFCMR), he submitted a supplemental promotion consideration package to the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) promotions section requesting that both decorations be considered. He spoke with the Base Level Awards and Decoration Element, researched the Air Education and Training Command policy and AFI 36-2803, The Air Force Military Awards and Decorations Program, and found the Décor-6 reflects when it...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01034

    Original file (BC-2012-01034.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had the squadron followed through with the AmnM processing, the former commander would have seen and approved the awards. One of the approved citations actually states "voluntary risk of life," which is what all of their original citations read before citations were changed to the AFCM for “acts of courage.” The AFI states that the AmnM will not be awarded for "normal performance of duties." Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 12 Dec 2012, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02263

    Original file (BC-2006-02263.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02263 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 JANUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). Enter each recommendation into official channels within two years and award within three...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00109

    Original file (BC 2014 00109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFGCM is awarded to Air Force enlisted personnel during a three-year period of active military service or for a one-year period of service during a time of war. The complete DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 Apr 14, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was provided to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2010-04456

    Original file (BC-2010-04456.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    They further advised, that before submitting a DD Form 149 requesting a change to her military record, the applicant must go back to the original approval authority of the AFCM and request administrative relief in accordance with AFI 36-2803, The Air Force Awards and Decorations Program, paragraphs, 1.5, 1.7, 3.3.8, and 3.4.2. In addition to reiterating previous contentions, they additionally contend that: a. AFI 36-2803, paragraphs 2.2.2 and 2.2.3., provide that; recommendations for Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03351

    Original file (BC-2013-03351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFCM was awarded to the applicant on 29 Mar 74; the “V” device was not authorized for the AFCM until on or after 11 Jan 96. The complete DPSID is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He meets all the requirements cited in the DPSID letter and AFI 36-2803 for award of a "V" device to his AFCM with the exception of the 11 Jan 96 date. We reviewed the recommendation for decoration for the BSM...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02387

    Original file (BC 2012 02387.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a memorandum dated 19 Mar 2013, the AFRS commander states the recommendation for the MSM was not forwarded for his approval in accordance with AFI 36-2803. The commander stated in his memorandum that generally personnel awarded the MSM had held supervisory positions at the flight chief or higher level and had exceptional duty performance. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02620

    Original file (BC 2014 02620.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02620 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be corrected to reflect award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). Per AFI 36-2803, The Air Force Military Awards and...